If you become a regular reader of this blog, you will inevitably see something controversial here. eHomebody.com is born out of a deep conviction that there is something tragically wrong with the way we view the home, the church, and society at large.
So, if you read something which seems a little “harsh,” please know that I do not intend to be unkind or cruel to those who suffer because of their own sins or those of others. My hope is to encourage you to avoid sin in the first place, and to offer peace and hope through Christ to those who already have sinned.
Thus, I give my answer to a very thought-provoking comment I received from a reader regarding the Considering Wedding Vows post of January 29, 2008.
Here is the comment in its entirety with answers to follow:
I find your phrasing about including divorce in your vows if you do not intend to stay married forever a little harsh. Most people honestly intend to keep their marriage vows and it is *often* the sinfulness of their spouses that forces the other one out of a marriage. Especially wherein one spouse became born-again after the marriage. There are cases wherein a believer can be divorced from an unbeliever and also the adultery clause. Divorce is a terribly sad situation and far far from ideal. But we live in a sinful world. Showing Christ-like compassion for divorcees who have been the victims of their partner’s sin would be a good thing. God hates divorce, but then He hates all sin. Divorce is not mentioned as the unpardonable sin. Yet we who have faced it *do* remember that we will face God and can only believe that His mercy will be richer than man’s.
Response:
I find your phrasing about including divorce in your vows if you do not intend to stay married forever a little harsh.
To begin with, it is important to keep in mind that the phrase being referred to does indeed state, “if you do not intend to stay married.” (Modified 01/30/08, see footnote) The whole purpose of the commentary I gave on this portion of the marriage vows was to root out any intentional misuse of divorce.
Divorce was only permitted because of the hardness of the hearts of men and women who were treacherous against their spouses (Malachi 2:14).[1] That is why Christ was so harsh when He confronted the hypocrisy of those in His audience who were misusing divorce in order to get out of providing for their wives and children when they wanted to take another wife.
I must note also that I never stated that one is to stay married forever, any more than the Bible does. It is, as the vows clearly state, until the death of one or the other making the vows. It only seems like “forever” when one is married to someone who is very difficult to live with.
Most people honestly intend to keep their marriage vows
I hope you are right about this, though there really is no way to know for sure. Though I might agree that most people who get married are not thinking about a divorce when they stand at the altar, far too many are making those same vows with the thought that, if it doesn’t turn out, they have an unconditional right to get a divorce.
My comments were made in order to move readers to consider what they are vowing more seriously and carefully. The only reason anyone should ever vow to stay married to someone until death parts one or the other is if they truly intend to do so.
and it is *often* the sinfulness of their spouses that forces the other one out of a marriage.
I have to disagree with this point. No one can force you to get a divorce. However, they can divorce you against your will. Now, if you mean that it is the sin of the other party which leads to the divorce, then I can agree with that. There is biblical grounds for allowing the unbeliever, if they insist, to divorce the believer, but only after the believer has exhausted every means of reconciliation (I Corinthians 7:15).
It is important to consider, also, that the “sinful spouse,” more than likely, has his or her own complaints about the sins of the “innocent spouse” which he or she believes contributed to the dissolution of the marriage.
Especially wherein one spouse became born-again after the marriage.
It is highly possible that the “sinfulness” of the unbelieving spouse will be magnified once the other has been converted. Your eyes are opened. You see things you never saw before, both in others and in yourself, which cause grief and sometimes even anger.
However, I Corinthians 7:16 and I Peter 3:1 both give the believing wife hope that, by the grace of God, she can be a means of grace in the life of her unbelieving husband. Divorce effectively derails that influence. A woman will never know what might have happened if she had stayed in the marriage, with a submissive spirit, and prayerfully waited to see if God would be gracious to her husband. However, I don’t know the situation to which you are specifically referring, so I cannot speak to it particularly.
I’m not saying that a spouse should stay in a marriage where there is sexual promiscuity (fornication) without repentance. In fact, a person should not be sleeping with anyone, married or otherwise, who is having sex with other partners. It could be debilitating or even fatal if venereal diseases were to be passed to the faithful spouse. In fact, if there is a separation because of this conduct, and the sin is eventually repented of, sexual relations should not commence again until the erring partner has been checked for disease and proper measures have been taken to protect the other party.
There are cases wherein a believer can be divorced from an unbeliever and also the adultery clause.
There is only one cause for divorce which I can find clearly stated in the Scriptures, and that is for fornication, which, of course, encompasses all forms of sexual deviation.[2]. However, that does not mean a divorce is the first course of action. Again, refer to my former point.
Divorce is a terribly sad situation and far far from ideal.
I agree wholeheartedly with this statement. In fact, divorce is devastating to all who are connected with the couple in question, especially any children which have been born of the union. I experienced this myself firsthand. I truly believe that the main reason that God hates divorce is because of what it does to women and children (Malachi 2:14, 15).
But we live in a sinful world.
Agreed, but let us not add sin to sin by seeking a divorce as a first course of action in a suffering marriage.
Showing Christ-like compassion for divorcees who have been the victims of their partner’s sin would be a good thing.
If there was no sin involved on the part of the one sinned against in the divorce, then the divorcee has all the Christ-like compassion I can give them by the grace of God. However, if the divorcee is truly honest, he or she has plenty of sins against the other spouse, which need to be repented of, and for which he or she must ask forgiveness of the other if he or she is to be right with God. Who knows? As long as neither party has remarried, doing this could even possibly be the means of reconciliation.
The most beautiful example of Christ’s compassion, however, was actually toward a “sinful spouse,” the adulterous woman He refers to in John 8:5-11. The truth is that Christ never had compassion on self-righteous people, but only those who were repentant for their own sin.
God hates divorce, but then He hates all sin.
It is true that God hates all sins, but not all sins are judged equally by God. We must neither belittle nor magnify any one sin by comparing it on the same level with all others.
Divorce is not mentioned as the unpardonable sin.
No, divorce is not the unpardonable sin. The glorious truth of the Gospel is that, apart from rejecting the Gospel (the unpardonable sin), there are no sins which are without the possibility of pardon through trusting in the sacrifice of Christ, the Lord and Savior.
Yet we who have faced it *do* remember that we will face God and can only believe that His mercy will be richer than man’s.
One will either face God with their sins forgiven through Christ, or will bear the guilt of their own sins and face eternal judgement.
Yet, this is where the Gospel comes in. There can be forgiveness, healing, and a new beginning for anyone through Christ. It begins by asking God to reveal the magnitude of our sin. Once we are truly made aware of our own sins, without citing the sins of others, we are ready to repent. Confession is then made to both God and man (those we have sinned against). Then, once we know that Christ’s blood has paid the penalty for those sins, then we receive the forgiveness, healing, and new beginning through the Spirit which brings us peace and life. (Job 42:6; Psalm 51:4; Romans 10:8-13; I John 1:9).
If you are suffering because of divorce either in your own marriage or that of someone close to you, then my heart absolutely grieves for you. It is a devastating thing for everyone involved. However, we will never make a difference in our world if we do not rebuke sin on the premise that it may be painful for someone to face. May you find peace through faith in Christ and obedience to His word.
[1] It has been said, “Divorce is an obtrusive symptom of the disease, not the disease itself.” (The disease being sin.) James Bryce. Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Vol. II, “Marriage and Divorce Under Roman and English Law” (New York: Oxford at The Clarendon Press, 1901), p. 452.
[2] The Greek word porneia, meaning “ illicit sexual intercourse: adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, etc.,” is used by our Lord in both Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 to clarify the just cause for divorce: StudyLight.org, The New Testament Greek Lexicon, 31 January 2008,
<http://www.studylight.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4202> (31 January 2008).
Note: The January 29, 2008, post entitled Concerning Marriage Vows, has been altered as follows:
“If you are going to go against the Bible and include the divorce option, then please be honest before God and man and include that phrase in your vows.”
Has been changed to:
“If you harbor any intention ahead of time of including an unbiblical divorce option in your marriage, then please be honest before God and man and include that phrase in your vows.”
“But, if you are not willing to stay together until one of you dies, then you are not ready to be married.”
Has been changed to:
“But, if you are not willing to honor your vows until your spouse dies, then you are not ready to make these vows.”
MW